Must We Divide History Into Periods? by Jacques Le Goff

By Jacques Le Goff

Trans. Malcolm DeBevoise

We have lengthy considered the Renaissance as a luminous period that marked a decisive holiday with the earlier, however the inspiration of the Renaissance as a special interval arose simply in the course of the 19th century. even though the view of the center a while as a dismal age of unreason has softened a little bit, we nonetheless find the appearance of contemporary rationality within the Italian concept and tradition of the 15th and 16th centuries.

Jacques Le Goff pleads for a strikingly varied view. during this, his final ebook, he argues persuasively that the various techniques we go together with the Renaissance have medieval roots, and that the various such a lot deplorable points of medieval society persisted to flourish throughout the Renaissance. we must always as an alternative view Western civilization as present process numerous "renaissances" following the autumn of Rome, over the process a protracted heart a long time that lasted until eventually the mid-eighteenth century.

While it's certainly essential to divide heritage into classes, Le Goff keeps, the significant continuities of human improvement simply develop into transparent whilst historians undertake an extended standpoint. real revolutions―the shifts that sign the tip of 1 interval and the start of the next―are a lot rarer than we think.

Show description

Read or Download Must We Divide History Into Periods? PDF

Similar historiography books


В  growth towards a fuller figuring out of preclassical Greece used to be regular till the Nineteen Fifties, whilst a normal hindrance in the entire human-centered disciplines erupted. students undertook a significant reexamination in their instruments and information, generating new manufacturers of background, geography, anthropology, archaeology, economics, and sociology.

The Myth of Seneca Falls: Memory and the Women's Suffrage Movement, 1848-1898

The tale of ways the women's rights stream started on the Seneca Falls conference of 1848 is a loved American fantasy. the normal account credit founders akin to Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and Lucretia Mott with defining after which major the crusade for women's suffrage. In her provocative new historical past, Lisa Tetrault demonstrates that Stanton, Anthony, and their friends steadily created and popularized this origins tale through the moment half the 19th century in keeping with inner move dynamics in addition to the racial politics of reminiscence after the Civil warfare.

Critical Discourse Analysis in Historiography: The Case of Hong Kong’s Evolving Political Identity

The e-book exhibits how the research of the evolving discourse hired in the course of a political strategy spanning greater than a decade gives you insights for severe discourse research, at the one hand, and realizing of a true international political method at the different, thereby demonstrating the aptitude position for serious discourse research in historiography.

Extra resources for Must We Divide History Into Periods?

Sample text

The first has to do with the importance of Italy in this long history of the periodization of time. During the pagan era, up until the advent of Christianity, Rome supplied the measure of Western time, starting with its mythical foundation by Romulus and Remus in the year 753 before Christ (a way of reckoning that, as I say, did not exist at this time since the triumphant entry of Jesus’s birth into Christian periodization dates only from Dennis the Small in the sixth century). Italy owed its prominent place in the medieval mind to other things: its conquest by the Lombards and then by Charlemagne; the presence in Rome of the pope, head of the Christian Church but also of the Papal States; an urban tradition of rule by the “commune,” this in a Europe otherwise dominated by monar- The Late Appearance of the Middle Ages | 19 chy; and the importance of both commerce (particularly with the East) and art.

The scope of the project made it both a model and a source for future research in European cultural history generally. I should therefore like to devote the rest of the present chapter to a brief summary of its main points. Burckhardt’s famous work is divided into six parts. ” He remarks on the early appearance in these two places of “statistical science,” among other instruments of power, together with a certain backwardness in the arts, at least at first, by comparison with the other great cities of the Renaissance in Italy.

He longed for a new light.  But none of these authors, nor indeed anyone else at the time, used a specific term to designate this period. The reason is that historians and men of letters were not in the habit then of dividing history into periods. It was customary to distinguish between “ancient,” “medieval,” and “modern,” but nothing more. Febvre observes that the term renaissance, with a small r, was frequently used to speak of the “rebirth” of the arts, for example, or of the humanities. But Michelet, profoundly moved by what he interpreted as a force of resurrection in the course of history, was the first to give the period that began with the fifteenth century in Europe, and above all in Italy, the name Renaissance, with a capital R.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.30 of 5 – based on 4 votes