# Modular Representation Theory: New Trends and Methods by David J. Benson (auth.)

By David J. Benson (auth.)

The objective of this 1983 Yale graduate direction used to be to make a few fresh leads to modular illustration conception obtainable to an viewers starting from second-year graduate scholars to tested mathematicians.

After a brief evaluate of historical past fabric, 3 heavily attached themes in modular illustration conception of finite teams are handled: representations jewelry, nearly break up sequences and the Auslander-Reiten quiver, complexity and cohomology types. The final of those has develop into a big topic in illustration conception into the twenty first century.

Some of this fabric was once included into the author's 1991 two-volume Representations and Cohomology, yet however Modular illustration Theory is still an invaluable introduction.

Read Online or Download Modular Representation Theory: New Trends and Methods PDF

Best abstract books

Intégration: Chapitres 7 et 8

Intégration, Chapitres 7 et 8Les Éléments de mathématique de Nicolas BOURBAKI ont pour objet une présentation rigoureuse, systématique et sans prérequis des mathématiques depuis leurs fondements. Ce quantity du Livre d’Intégration, sixième Livre du traité, traite de l’intégration sur les groupes localement compacts et de ses functions.

Extra resources for Modular Representation Theory: New Trends and Methods

Sample text

Let G be a group, and N and H subgroups ofG with N normal. Then NH = HN is a subgroup ofG. Proof Since N is a normal subgroup of G, it is easily seen that N H = H N. Now let x,y E NH. We wish to show that xy-l E NH. Since x and yare elements of NH, x = nh and y = nIhl for some elements n,nl EN and h, hI E H. Then, since N is normal, and the result now follows. D. 18] (The Second Isomorphism Theorem). Let G be a group, N a normal subgroup of G and H a subgroup of G. Then N is a normal subgroup of NH, H n N is a normal subgroup of H, and H HN NH (HnN) ~N=N' as illustrated by the following diamond-shaped diagram.

13)' (4). D. 16]. Let R be a ring and [ an ideal of R. The following assertions hold. (1) The quotient set R/ [ is a ring via the operations [a] + [b) = [a + b) and [a] [b] = [a b) . (2) Themap kr : R -+ R/[ defined by kr(x) = [x] (x E R) is a surjective homomorphism of rings with ker (k r) = [. The map kr is called the canonical surjection from R to R/[. Proof. 14)' and is left to the reader. D. Remark. If [ is an ideal of from group theory. (1) If x E R, then [x] = (2) If x, y E R, then, in x -y E I.

15] (The First Isomorphism Theorem). Let I: G _ H be a surjective homomorphism of groups and K = ker (I). Then K is a normal subgroup of G and ~~H G () : K - via the map H defined by ()( [x] ) = I(x) . Proof. 13], K is a normal subgroup of G and, if x, y E G, then in the quotient group GIK, [x] = [y] if, and only if, I(x) = I(y). Hence the map () is both well-defined (that is, independent of the choice of representative of the equivalence class) and injective. The verification that () is an isomorphism of groups is now routine and is left to the reader.